Introduction to Phenomenolgy
Course Materials
Course Outline
Introduction to Phenomenology is a level one introductory course that is part of a larger three module Philosophy of Consciousness series. The other higher level modules are Science, Consciousness and the Brain, and Language and Meaning. Both these modules assume students have already completed this introductory course. The idea of The Introduction to Phenomenology is to guide each participant into an immediate experience of what it means to engage in a phenomenological inquiry. So the course is less concerned with conveying information about phenomenology, and more concerned with students gaining direct insight into the state of witnessing that Husserl first encountered in his Logical Investigations at the turn of the nineteenth century. Here we take the way of The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology (Husserl’s last published work). Along this way we examine Husserl’s understanding of phenomenology as the natural outcome of the evolution of Western philosophy from Descartes to Kant. Then we go into the heart of his work by examining and enacting his phenomenological reduction.
Topic List
Topic One: What is Philosophy?
Lecture Outline: This is an introductory lecture and so involves everyone introducing themselves and my giving an overview of the course. As this was the first time I had taught the course using Husserl’s Crisis of the European Sciences text (before I had used the Cartesian Meditations), there was no worked-out plan as to where the course was heading. Instead we set out into the text to see how far we could get. This week’s lecture involved going through the first Chapter of the Crisis (see the Crisis reading, §1 – §7) and asking the question “What is philosophy?” by examining Husserl’s final published answer.
Lecture Recording: Part One:
Lecture Recording: Part Two:
Course Introduction
Topic One: What is Philosophy?
Time: 10:00am – 2:00pm
Date: Saturday, September 28th 2019
Place: Hollingdean Depot, Upper Hollingdean Road, Brighton BN1 7GA
First, I’m making some changes this year
The course outline in the freegree handbook and on the calendar described the course as it was offered over the last three years (2016-2018). However, I have decided to change things this year and instead of focussing on Husserl’s Cartesian Meditations we are going to look at The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology. This is a challenging book and represents Husserl’s final published way into phenomenology.
Husserl himself was never quite happy with the Cartesian Meditations and his later philosophy was also influenced by the criticisms of his former assistant, Martin Heidegger. So I think, despite the challenging nature of the Crisis text, it provides the better account of Husserl’s mature understanding of phenomenology.
Because I have decided to change things so late in the day, the course is going to be a work in progress. We may indeed spend the entire 10 weeks just on the Crisis text. I would like to see how it goes. My basic aim is to make Husserl’s transcendental phenomenological reduction understandable to everyone who is willing to persevere with the course material. If we can achieve that I think we will have done something important and significant.
Next, something to do
I am taking it that for many of you this will be the first phenomenological philosophy class you have taken, so, to begin, we’re going to address the basic question: “What is Philosophy?” from a phenomenological perspective. That means inquiring into yourself in order to discover what philosophy means to you. This may sound strange, for surely you should already know what philosophy means to you. Well, what does philosophy mean to you? What do you find when you ask that question? I am not asking for a definition here, that you could obtain from the internet or from a library. I am asking why, for instance, you are here, attending this course, what you are hoping and expecting. I am wondering if the meaning of philosophy, once you think about it, is not something rather puzzling. Perhaps you have already thought about this question and have a clear answer at hand, or perhaps you find you have no clear answer, and that you’re hoping to discover such an answer by studying at the Free University. If you have no clear answer, that’s good, that means you can start to genuinely inquire, rather than dig something out of your memory. To begin, I think you will find you did have some idea about philosophy that guided you to take the course in the first place, even if you haven’t made this idea explicit to yourself. It’s this, perhaps vague, idea that I am interested in.
To that end I’d like everyone who wants to attend to examine this question beforehand and to come along having written down a few ideas. I am planning for you to hand in whatever you have written so please make it legible and attach your name to it. You should also bring two copies – one for me and one for yourself to refer to in the class. You can also do this electronically and send me a copy on Ryver. I will not be judging or marking what you write so there is no pressure to make it perfect – I just want you to take some time before the class to really think about this – and I find writing down ideas that you know someone else is going to read really helps focus the mind.
To make this more definite I’d like you to write a minimum of 200 words in a similar style to the way I am writing here (i.e. informally but not just dot points or isolated words) – and feel free to write more if you find you have more to say.
Thirdly, there is this week’s reading
I have uploaded the first chapter of Husserl’s Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology where he also addresses the question “What is Philosophy?” I suggest you read this after you have written down your own ideas – as Husserl has a quite definite idea of what philosophy is about and I don’t want that to influence what you say.
The idea of the reading is to form a basis for our discussion during the first class, so I’d like everyone to become engaged with what Husserl has to say beforehand. Being engaged is not the same as coming to a full or fixed understanding – so don’t worry if your reading raises more questions than it answers. In fact I would like your reading to raise more questions than it answers – then we will have something fruitful to deal with in the class…
Finally, here is a brief idea of what we shall be doing
After this introductory week, the course will be concerned with the single question “What is Phenomenology?” To address this question we will be looking into our own immediate experience of being conscious and relating that to Husserl’s Crisis text. The course content is not fixed in advance. The plan is rather to develop each class as we go along, according to the progress we are making with the various readings and ideas that are introduced.
In the final analysis, our meetings are not primarily about accumulating information about what Husserl has said, they are about engaging in a philosophical (phenomenological) enquiry, about finding out what that means, and then actually getting under way.
As for myself, I have a PhD in artificial intelligence and have worked and published in this area as an academic for the last twenty-five years or so, now as an Honorary Reader at the University of Sussex and formerly as an Associate Professor at Griffith University in Australia. I am particularly interested in phenomenology and its relation to the sciences of the mind (i.e. cognitive science in general, and neuroscience in particular). Currently I am supervising two PhD students who are working on computational (predictive processing) models of the functioning of the neocortex and I still publish the occasional paper in this area. For more details see my brain-inspired research page.
Introduction Topic 1 Overheads
Crisis Introduction Reading
Topic Two: Science and Objectivism
Lecture Outline: This class follows Husserl’s path into phenomenology by looking into the underlying meaning or entelechy he saw in the development of modern science and philosophy. In the readings we are jumping from the introduction of the Crisis to sections §10-13 (Crisis Reading §10-13). This misses out sections §8-9 which are concerned with the mathematical foundations of modern science. These sections are significant in themselves but I deal with them in another course (Science, Consciousness and the Brain) which some of you have already attended. The key thing this week is for us to gain an understanding of the origins of the dualism of mind and matter in the birth of modern science. So we shall be looking at how Galilean science split the psychic world from the world of physical bodies and how this played out in the development of psychology in the empiricism of Locke, Berkeley and Hume (Crisis Reading §22-24).
Lecture Recording: Part One:
Lecture Recording: Part Two:
Lecture Recording: Part Three:
Introduction Topic 2 Overheads
Husserl Dualism Reading
Husserl Empiricism Reading
Topic Three: Descartes and Transcendentalism
Lecture Outline: This week we continue to follow Husserl’s path into phenomenology by looking into the underlying meaning or entelechy he saw in the development of modern science and philosophy. Due to our more detailed treatment of Galilean science in Topic Two (see Part 1 of the lecture recording) we did not finish all the material as planned. I have therefore split the original Topic Two into two lectures (Topic Two covered §10-13 of the Crisis and this week we will cover §14-20 plus Descartes’ first two Meditations. That means if you did last week’s reading then there’s no new reading for this week. However, I suggest you re-read all of Crisis §10-20 as I think it will be clearer now we have had the lecture. And for anyone who hasn’t done the readings yet now is your chance to catch up. (Don’t forget Descartes’ first two Meditations – they are quite essential for any kind of understanding of modern philosophy, quite apart from understanding Husserl).
Lecture Recording: Part One:
Lecture Recording: Part Two:
Introduction Topic 3 Overheads
Descartes' Meditations Reading
Husserl on Descartes Reading
Topic Four: Kant and the Life World
Lecture Outline: In the reading this week we shall enter into Part IIIA of the Crisis where Husserl begins his own investigation into the pre-given life-world. To begin he contrasts his approach with that of Kant – arguing that Kant was unable to find his way into true phenomenology because of his rationalistic presuppositions. Our focus here is not on Kant and we will not attempt to understand his Critique of Pure Reason – that would require another course of equivalent length to this one. Our interest is only in how Husserl understands Kant as a kind of first step toward the true task of transcendental philosophy: the uncovering of the life-world and the transcendental subjectivity that lies behind it.
(Note: in the lecture we finished off last week’s material on Descartes and so only covered §28 of the reading on Kant. We will therefore cover §29-33 next week in Topic 5.)
Lecture Recording: Part One:
Lecture Recording: Part Two:
Lecture Recording: Part Three:
Introduction Topic 4 Overheads
Husserl Life World Reading
Topic Five: Kant and Transcendental Subjectivity
Lecture Outline: Due to finishing the material on Descartes last week combined with my usual digressions we only covered §28 of the Husserl reading on Kant. I think there is enough left in that reading (in §29-33) to keep us busy this week, so there is no new Husserl reading (§28-33 from the Crisis are available in Topic 4). However I am aware we have been looking at Kant without having read him, so I am uploading the beginning sections of the Critique of Pure Reason. There is around 100 pages of material here, the Transcendental Aesthetic, Transcendental Logic, and the Analytic of Concepts. This includes the Transcendental Deduction that Husserl mentions in our reading and the all important sections on space and time (in the Transcendental Aesthetic). We will not be going through this in class so it is not required reading, but it will help in understanding Husserl’s references to Kant – and in any case, these sections of the Critique are as foundational to Western philosophy as Descartes’ Meditations, so are worth reading in their own right. (Note: this is the 1896 First Edition of the Critique so the translation differs in certain respects from the modern English translations – we are using this older edition as it is out of copyright).
Lecture Recording: Part One:
Lecture Recording: Part Two:
Introduction Topic 5 Overheads
Kant Critique Reading
Topic Six: The Epoche of the Objective Sciences
Lecture Outline: After the half-term break we shall be examining Husserl’s way into phenomenology, starting with the epochē of the objective sciences, as explained in §34-35 of the Crisis (see this week’s reading). Until now we have been laying the ground for this epochē by looking at the objectivism of modern science and the split this has caused in our understanding of being. Now we shall look at how this split can be bridged by examining how objective science is grounded in our immediate experience of the life-world.
Lecture Recording: Part One:
Lecture Recording: Part Two:
Introduction Topic 6 Overheads
Husserl Epochē of Science Reading
Topic Seven: The Universal Epoche
Lecture Outline: This week we arrive at the true door into phenomenology, the universal epochē, as introduced in §36-41 of the Crisis (see this week’s reading). Although we have been speaking of, and alluding to the transcendental subjectivity that constitutes the validities of our immediate experience of the life-world, it is only now that Husserl finally makes explicit his way into this subjectivity.
Lecture Recording: Part One:
Lecture Recording: Part Two:
Lecture Recording: Part Three:
Introduction Topic 6 Overheads
Husserl Universal Epochē Reading
Topic Eight: Carrying Out the Reduction
Lecture Outline: Now we have encountered the universal epochē, our task is to explore what is revealed in this transcendental reduction of the world to the transcendental phenomenon “world.” This is described in §42-49 of the Crisis (see this week’s reading). It is here that we enter into the detail of Husserl’s transcendental investigation into the “how” of the world’s pre-givenness.
Lecture Recording: Part One:
Lecture Recording: Part Two:
Introduction Topic 8 Overheads
Husserl Reduction Reading
Topic Nine: The Transcendental Ego
Lecture Outline: Husserl’s initial inquiry within the transcendental reduction asked after the transcendental constitution of the world and the things we perceive within the horizon of the world. He now finally turns toward the transcendental ego that enacts this constitution (see §50-55 of the Crisis in the attached reading). These sections conclude Husserl’s way into phenomenology by means of an inquiry back from the pregiven life-world. In Part IIIB of the Crisis he takes another route via a consideration of psychology – a route we will not be following in this course. That means we have come to the end of our investigation of the Crisis text and it only remains to assimilate what we have discovered into our deeper understanding of what it means to be conscious.
Lecture Recording: Part One:
Lecture Recording: Part Two:
Lecture Recording: Part Three:
Introduction Topic 9 Overheads
Husserl Transcendental Ego Reading
Topic Ten: Course Review and Assignment
Lecture Outline: This week we will finish the topic nine material on the transcendental ego and then review the previous lectures to get an overall idea of the trajectory of the course. There is no new reading, just §50-55 from last week.
Lecture Recording: Part One:
Lecture Recording: Part Two:
Introduction to Phenomenology Assignment
Final Essay
What did Husserl think was the crisis of European sciences and how did he think transcendental phenomenology could address that crisis? Do you think Husserl’s Crisis text is still relevant for the situation in which we find ourselves today? Explain.
The Assignment Rules
This essay will be assessed on a pass or resubmit basis. That means if I do not think it comes up to the standard of a university assessment item I will return it to you explaining what needs improving. You can then keep resubmitting and getting my feedback for a further month after the initial submission date of Saturday February 1st 2020. I strongly suggest you get a first draft to me by Saturday 11th January so I can make sure you are going in the right direction. The 3,000 word guideline does not mean you must submit exactly 3,000 words. Up to 100 words under will be OK and you can exceed 3,000 words by as much as you wish. However, these 3,000 words need to be in sentences of your own devising, so, if you quote the work of others, this will not count toward your total. Also, supplementary material, such as a list of references, will not count.
The Requirements
The main issue with written university assessments is usually that people do not answer the question that the person setting the assignment had in mind. I am going to put down what I have in mind here, but you still may end up with a different interpretation of what I am saying. It is therefore important that you talk to me in person about anything that seems unclear, and, when you start writing, to send me a first draft, well before you submit, to check that I think you are on the right track. So, here is a list of topics that I expect you to address in the essay:
- Husserl’s understanding of the development of modern science and modern philosophy. This should cover the ideas of universal science and universal reason, objectivism and transcendentalism, Husserl’s idea of the telos of European humanity, and the manner in which Husserl thinks European sciences have fallen into crisis.
- What Husserl means by transcendental phenomenology. This should explain how phenomenology can resolve the contradictions of previous philosophers, particularly Descartes, Hume and Kant. It should also give an account of transcendental phenomenology itself, including the roles of the epochē of objective science and the universal epochē, and what it is that the epochē reveals. Here you can additionally refer to experiences and understandings based on your own phenomenological inquiries.
- Finally you should consider whether the Crisis text still has something important to say about modern science and our modern understandings of consciousness. Here you should do some research of your own, looking at the effect that phenomenology has had on modern cognitive science. People to read include Francesco Varela, Dan Zahavi and Dermont Moran. In this final section it is important that you explain and justify your view not simply state what you think.
References
Husserl, E. (1970). The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Philosophy: An Introduction to Phenomenological Philosophy